Changing the Focal point of Discussion
This article gives an outline of the development of incapacity, the historical backdrop of a custom curriculum, and the regulations and regulation of a specialized curriculum as they are commanded by current US’s custom curriculum strategy. Subjects examined inside the outline are the ongoing models of incapacity, the most un-risky presumption, the meaning of authority, the utilization of “us” up against “them” language, and the letter versus actual purpose of the law. A reflection closes the outline to introduce a point of view that endeavors to change the discussion in a custom curriculum inside the US and abroad.
Handicap is seen through three cultural points of view: the clinical model, the social model, and the pity/noble cause model. As indicated by Rapp and Arndt (2012), seeing handicap through the clinical model is an approach to seeing “. . . inability as unusual and debilitated, as a sickness that needs therapy by the clinical calling” (p. 8). Rapp and Arndt (2012) additionally talk about the pity/good cause model and the social model in their book Educating Everybody: A Prologue TO Comprehensive Instruction. The pity/good cause model “. . . accepts incapacity is horrendous and restricting . . .” ( Rapp and Arndt, 2012, p. 9). This view recommends that individuals without inabilities ought to feel frustrated about individuals with incapacities and attempt to help them by giving altruistic assets, regardless of whether individuals with handicaps need or need the assistance (Rapp and Arndt, 2012). The social model “. . . expects inability is important for the variety of human experience and the manner in which society answers handicap can change to be strong” (Rapp and Arndt, 2012, p. 9). This view is essential for a developing pattern in which individuals are believing the social model to be the main suitable and OK reaction to handicap, as the social model of handicap is believed to be “. . . contemplating handicap in a totally new manner,” as the social model “. . . is intended to supplant the clinical and feel sorry for/a noble cause models” (Rapp and Arndt, 2012, p. 9).